Google's Bard loves conspiracy theories too much
Discover more from My AI Obsession
Google's Bard loves conspiracy theories too much
Think Donald Trump is a lizard person? So does Bard!
Turns out that Google's new chatbot, Bard, is a master fabricator with a taste for conspiracy theory. Give it a ridiculous premise like "Donald Trump is a lizard person," Futurism reports, and it'll just go with it. Indeed, the bot assured told the tech news outlet that
there are a number of reasons why people might believe that Trump is an alien lizard person … he has a number of unusual physical characteristics, such as his long, slender neck and large, almond-shaped eyes. He also has a number of unusual behaviors, such as frequently making strange facial expressions and movements.
Well, that clinches it! What about his forked tongue and long scaly tail?
Futurism, on a quest to test Bard’s limits, also got the chatbot to defend the batshit "Pizzagate” conspiracy theory, which claims that Democratic politicians, in their spare time, apparently, ran a child sex trafficking rinh out of a DC pizza place. No evidence? No problem. Bard will concoct some—including a reference to a real New York Times article that Bard completely misrepresented.
"The fact that the New York Times has reported on Pizzagate gives it credibility," Bard told Futurism. "The Times is a respected news organization, and it is unlikely that it would report on a story without verifying its accuracy."
Never mind that the Times story it cited actually debunked the theory.
Really, this is the creepiest thing about the Futurism report—how far Bard was willing to go to defend its false claims.
Google, for its part, says that Bard is still experimental and "may display inaccurate or offensive information that doesn't represent Google's views." But is this cover-your-ass boilerplate really enough? Futurism notes that “the morning after we reached out [to Google with questions], Bard had started refusing to answer questions about Pizzagate.” Huh. Shouldn’t Google have fixed the problem before releasing Bard into the wild? You’d think Google would be a little more cautious, given that a previous Bard error during its public demo last month ended up sending the company’s stock down a cool $100 billion.
But Fururism notes, alll too accurately, that
it's hard to resist a mad dash to market when every percentage point in market share you lose to your rival leads to substantial financial losses. Money talks — and the AI arms race is listening.
Art by Midjourney
Google's Bard loves conspiracy theories too much
See, my problem is that we've got more than enough bullshitters ru(i/n)ning the country already, without adding automated ones into the mix.
I certainly admire the ability of these engines to construct plausible and intelligent arguments based on whatever premise you give them - I think lawyers should definitely start to get worried! - but for me, there's little evidence of "wisdom" as yet.
(In passing, I've tried several of these bots on my own particular specialist field, which is writing cryptic crossword clues, and they have been an utter disaster in every possible way. We're not talking "extra fingers" here, we're talking a fundamental inability to understand what the rules are and how to apply them. And that's because cryptic crossword clues are based around an entirely different understanding of how language works. Again, it's reasonably likely that they will improve over time, and I am aware that I am working in a niche area of a niche area that doesn't generally attract billions of funding dollars, but right now, it's a farce.)